Is creative fatigue building—or did delivery change?
Compare the latest 14 days with the previous 14. The screen looks for a combination of weaker results, falling link CTR and rising frequency, while checking whether spend stayed broadly comparable. It gives you evidence and a next test—not an automatic pause recommendation.
You are seeing synthetic demo data until you import your own export. Summer Reset intentionally demonstrates a strong fatigue pattern; recent launches make the pipeline views illustrative too. Concept, angle, hook and creator are optional team labels, not standard Meta export fields.
Performance overview
Creative fatigue & next actions
Family-level comparison: latest 14 days vs prior 14 days. Strong indicators require weaker efficiency, falling link CTR and rising frequency, with spend within ±30% of its prior level.
Efficiency over time
Weekly account ROAS or CPA. Use this to spot a change, then investigate what changed in spend, audience and creative mix.
Signals to investigate
Flags are diagnostic prompts, not proof that a creative caused the change.
Creative family performance
Ranked by spend. Efficiency is evaluated against the target you set above.
Spend by observed ad age
Age starts at first spend found in this export, unless an ad creation date is present.
Creative families
See family-level spend and outcome. Import visual-family labels or use filename-matched images to make this a true visual review.
Spend-weighted creative age
Average age of ads receiving spend in each 14-day window. Each day’s spend weights that ad’s age on that day.
Launch cohorts and spend
Daily spend grouped by first-seen launch month. Falling cohort spend can mean budget changed; it does not by itself prove fatigue.
Production and mature hit rate
Ads first seen each week vs the share of mature ads meeting your target after reaching the spend floor.
Weekly spend mix by ad age
How delivery shifts across age bands. This is account exposure, not a recommended new-ad share.